་་
.[
.Y % O
378
‚muof noisivel
TOU wan
*VA 0301
20 diapuwa nd no Tuddal Toy bevieso1 svad I
and to eeloV owd and mi boyevoovih nad oval holdy radici ado
-motob duty rot ‚eeizqwa J 197y ntiw wwed out to noistİDE Asaivaf to equefrond Ilut Jwoww iw notacionos a da beviris oven woy Jone– sek daliw etnielyios and tečene vilupus Juodd is bra,adost sfie
.be bawo't I lo% oʻm Dba... [090
1 boib seid koittib doen, ytov old gasilsuf
di- Imah od prolinogion sasnino vino privad (de iw Ineditoo of Bari oldimpar alud to dhow a ni ja♬ aoicanos viev galeo cels has none del od ragu.' .7 tit bud couper I modu od plexil orew aqila
Ji o nim seroqya vilaioaqa anonauibru old rigourne og troddisqÜ bui I Dewton cap noiteollyga y .moisive and Moono od rabro ni de pood ever I ins,bebi-elpie noid wititev wild ob od exotereild
OIC DIS: 3 Ovelled fom ob I .ariano Ti” dhul and not Ji Ja Azov
novine u malé reidandonad101 8 şi ci 1.8 B10119 TEAJO LIA.
HAI VYA .nomo de bonsvoosib read oven sped dend sousbionico gofr Tani:e,puila pʼzotning wis "eknojirioo* end Su roidzoyong
1000 melo yo J nalessio buzujetne od eldisaoyni stimp si di
Jon ei i jh.drby deudub end lnts "sæenq not gninesy" cilt neorded
vio) em hi anem Jostreg JLO B An innog virsALIMI
biror #ised bodning-en over coo egile Jugila dolu no sopsy and
V boul over I .c.ng botnlıq-or end no erom yres on od vldadong
Lar oly snoyns bne,yoloɔ old mi exodning and to conviteqze ersoy
-nim ecoftes ne yet of two wo tsed Illy consinegre unlinie o bou
ond #vari oð ærebno m. vi, ecruco to eval I banteono AIB BLGAJ-
.bedninger nO_AQ
•
Bog je bim od nano Isioage and diw Issb von
mi Odtl to II .ol to (I)8S .e ni odotain odd (I) .am berteĵor even
nå kulm one ni moldoen and dyrondle Jud ¡eno arcinot a scruno to end Loyaneo di,poauniinu noizivek iz unnü náð má nafn glob
דיי
attention of the Attorney General, and also of the adviser to the
Secretary of State who specially referred to the other amendment to
the section in one of his despatches. It is an oversight, which
has been put straight. (ii) the errors in the references to
certain Ordinances, as you say "at once" discovered by the Attorney
General and the Crown Solicitor, and one other which I have also
discovered, are not vital, and can at once be corrected. So far as
the one discovered by the Colonial Secretary in the head-line of No. 10 of 1899, when a perfect compositor has been invented such slips will not occur; till that time they are inevitable.
(iii) The Colonial Treasurer's minute.
(a). The slip in the figures in No. 1 of 1888 will be
corrected at once.
(b). Nos. 6 of 1889 and 11 of 1906; the Treasurer did
say he thought these Ordinances were dead, but I do not agree with
him, and did not choose to take the responsibility of repealing
them. I commend to his notice s.ll of the former Ordinance; he
will then see his mistake. With regard to the latter I do not know
whether there are any pensions still payable; if there are the
Ordinance should not be repealed.
(c). No. 6 of 1901. The Treasurer thinks it is "almost
certain" he gave me the amended figures. I really cannot recollect If he did I was wrong in overlooking them. But if he did not his remark that *s. 31 anyway should have suggested examination" is
simply preposterous.
(d). No. 5 of 1909. The Treasurer is quite wrong.
(iv) The Attorney-General's memorandum. Many of the errors he has detected seem to be in the Corrigenda, and I will go through them
in due course. His "error No. 46" is however meaningless, 28
there is no "No. 24 of 1904". His "error No. 51* is merely borrow-
-ed from a minute of my own suggesting that all references to the Empire of China would have to be revised when the New Govern- -ment is recognised. It is of course a pity that I did not know that the Revolution would be successful when I was revising
that
Page 390Page 391
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.